Re: [IPsec] Roadmap -07: two minor and one major comments

At 9:38 AM +0300 6/27/10, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>Also, per my comment to -06, I still think that Appendix A (req levels for RFCs that are *not* algorithms) needs to go:
>
>- It mostly consists of empty space, "optional" and "N/A".
>- It adds normative weight to an informative document.
>- It is of little use to implementers. People will be reading the roadmap doc itself to decide what RFCs they need in their product, based on market needs.

Not wearing a hat, I also agree with Yaron about Appendix A. I don't see what an implementer is going to get from reading it.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Internet-Drafts_at_nospam: "[IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-08.txt"
• Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "[IPsec] Closing IPsecME work on PAKE"
• In reply to: Yaron Sheffer: "[IPsec] Roadmap -07: two minor and one major comments"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]